BLOG

FAILED TO FILE FBAR

January 15, 2017

By Ephraim Moss, Esq. & Joshua Ashman, CPA

Share this article

FBAR PENALTIES: COURT FINDS COUPLE WILLFULLY FAILED TO FILE FBAR

If you thought FBAR penalties were more bark than bite, a recent U.S. District Court case is sure to change your mind.

In United States v. August Bohanec et ux, USDC CD Ca., No. 2:15-cv-04347 (December 2016), the Court found that the taxpayer’s failure to file the FBAR was willful and affirmed the IRS’s enhanced FBAR civil penalty, i.e., a fine equal to the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the balance in their unreported accounts.

THE FBAR REQUIREMENT – A QUICK BACKGROUND

The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) gives the Department of Treasury the authority to collect information from United States persons, including expats, who have financial interests in or signature authority over financial accounts maintained with financial institutions located outside of the United States.

The BSA requires that a FinCEN Report 114, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), be filed if the maximum values of the foreign financial accounts exceed $10,000 in the aggregate at any time during the calendar year.  The FBAR form (FinCEN Form 114) must be filed electronically using the BSA E-Filing System maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”).

For tax years 2016 and onwards, the FBAR due date is April 15th, with a maximum extension of 6 months.

FBAR PENALTIES

A “non-willful”’ failure to report foreign bank accounts can result in a penalty of up to $10,000 per account per year.  The IRS has recently stated that these penalties represent maximum amounts and lower penalties may be appropriate depending on the circumstances.

A “willful” failure to file may be subject to civil penalties equal to the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the balance in each unreported account.  In addition, criminal penalties of up to $250,000 or 5 years in jail (or both) may apply in the case of willful conduct.

THE BOHANEC CASE

In the Bohanec decision, the taxpayers were a California couple who for many years held Swiss UBS accounts, as well as other foreign bank accounts in Austria and Mexico, and failed to report the accounts on their FBARs. The couple actually attempted to come clean by applying for tax amnesty through the IRS’s OVDP program.  The IRS rejected their application because they in fact did not include all of their accounts in their disclosure submission.

The Court addressed whether the couple’s failure should be considered “willful” for purposes of imposing the enhanced FBAR Penalties. Interestingly, in contrast to the IRS’s past advice that “willfulness” should be defined more narrowly as “having knowledge and specific intent,” the Court accepted the broader definition of being “at least recklessly indifferent to a statutory duty.”

The couple was found by the Court to be so reckless due to the fact that they were sophisticated as businesspeople, but they never provided their bank with their home address (in the U.S.), and never told anyone other than their children of the existence of their account, including the tax preparers that they hired to help them file tax returns.  The Court found that the couple should have known better, and simple communication with a lawyer, accountant, banker, or other professional about their foreign accounts would have alerted them as to their need to report them to the U.S. government.

FAILING TO FILE IS A SERIOUS MATTER

For FBAR delinquent taxpayers, programs are provided by the IRS to prevent potentially disastrous outcomes that could otherwise result from nondisclosure.  However, depending on the facts and circumstances, a taxpayer may fail one or more of the program’s eligibility requirements and have to look at other potential solutions.

The team at Expat Tax Professionals has years of experience with FBAR fillings and helping FBAR delinquent taxpayers come into compliance with their reporting obligations.  We can help you determine which program is best for your particular case, so that you can put past delinquencies behind you for good.

More from our experts:

APPLYING THE FEIE TO INTERNATIONAL WATERS

In this blog, we explore a scenario where income is not earned in the United States, nor is it earned in a foreign country, but rather in international waters, a significant area of the world that is not under the territory of any one particular country.

USING FORM 8832 TO CHANGE THE US TAX CLASSIFICATION OF YOUR COMPANY

We discuss why entity tax classification is an important consideration for your company. We then dive into the technical mechanism for changing your company’s U.S. tax classification using the IRS Form 8832.

US TAX SOFTWARE – COMPARING SOLUTIONS FOR US EXPATS

We look at some of the unique challenges faced by U.S. expat taxpayers, particularly those challenges which are left unmet by U.S. tax software of the off-the-shelf variety.

FOREIGN EXCLUSION VERSUS FOREIGN TAX CREDIT

For U.S. expats, avoiding the double taxation of income is a key expat tax basic concept. In most cases, this is accomplished by either utilizing the foreign earned income exclusion (FEIE) or the foreign tax credit (FTC). But which method is better?