BLOG

TRANSITION TAX RATES

October 10, 2018

By Joshua Ashman, CPA & Nathan Mintz, Esq.

Share this article

OWNERS OF FISCAL YEAR FOREIGN CORPORATIONS TO SEE HIGHER TRANSITION TAX RATES

Owners of fiscal-year foreign corporations (i.e., corporations that do not have a tax year end of December 31) owing “transition tax” generally have the luxury of waiting until next year’s tax season to deal with reporting and paying the one-time tax liability.

Such individuals may be surprised to find out, however, that their transition tax rate will actually be significantly higher than owners of calendar-year foreign corporations who were tasked with filing and paying the tax this year.

In this blog, we review the basics of the transition tax and its calculation and demonstrate why the transition tax rate should increase next year.

THE TRANSITION TAX – HOW DOES IT WORK?

As part of the transition to a so-called participation exemption system (which we describe more fully here), new Section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code uses the mechanics under Subpart F to impose on U.S. shareholders owning at least 10% of a foreign subsidiary a one-time mandatory “repatriation tax” or “transition tax” on the undistributed, non-previously taxed post-1986 foreign earnings and profits (“E&P”) of a “specified foreign corporation” (“SFC”).

A SFC is defined as (i) any CFC, and (ii) any foreign corporation with respect to which one or more domestic corporations is a 10% United States shareholder. It should be noted that a PFIC that is not a CFC is exempted from being treated as a SFC.

Section 965 specifies, importantly, that the transition tax applies to the greater of the accumulated post-1986 deferred foreign income (essentially the previously untaxed earnings and profits) of the foreign corporation determined as of November 2, 2017 or as of December 31, 2017. In order to prevent pre-transition tax avoidance planning, the section adds that E&P is determined by essentially ignoring dividends distributed during the 2017 taxable year (other than dividends distributed to another specified foreign corporation).

DOES THE TRANSITION TAX APPLY TO INDIVIDUAL SHAREHOLDERS?

The IRS’s recently promulgated proposed Section 965 regulations confirm that Section 965 does not distinguish U.S. corporate shareholders from other U.S. shareholders, so the transition tax potentially applies to any U.S. person (including an individual) owning at least 10% of a foreign subsidiary.

The Preamble to the regulations notes that “numerous comments were received requesting guidance exempting individuals from the application of Section 965,” however, the “statute is clear that Section 965 applies to all United States shareholders.” As support, the Preamble also quotes the Conference Report on the bill enacting the transition tax, which states that “In contrast to the participation exemption deduction available only to domestic corporations that are U.S. shareholders under Subpart F, the transition rule applies to all U.S. shareholders.”

HOW IS THE TRANSITION TAX CALCULATED?

The transition tax calculation can be tricky, particularly because it is not set out as a particular rate of tax. Instead, the tax is applied at ordinary rates (as would be the case with other Subpart F income), but only after the undistributed, non-previously taxed post-1986 foreign E&P of the SFC have been reduced by a certain “plug deduction.”

For U.S. shareholders of calendar-year SFCs, the plug deduction is 55.7% in the case of E&P comprising cash (and certain cash equivalents described in the statute) and 77.1% in the case of any remaining E&P. The 55.7% plug is determined by applying a ratio that is 15.5% over 35%, while the 77.1% plug is determined by applying a ratio that is 8% over 35%. The 35% denominator represents the maximum corporate tax rate for the 2017 tax year, which is the year of the transition tax inclusion for U.S. shareholders of calendar-year SFCs. After applying the plug deductions, the ultimate transition tax rate for individuals taxed at the highest 2017 ordinary rate of 39.6% should therefore be approximately 17.5% in the case of E&P comprising cash and cash equivalents (100% – 55.7% times 39.6%) and approximately 9.1% in the case of any remaining E&P (100% – 77.1% times 39.6%).

For U.S. shareholders of fiscal-year SFCs (i.e., foreign corporations with a tax year end that is not December 31), the year of the transition tax inclusion should be the 2018 tax year and not the 2017 tax year. Because of this, the plug deduction will be significantly lower because the maximum corporate tax rate for the 2018 tax year is 21%, a significant reduction from the previous rate of 35%. In the case of E&P comprising cash (and cash equivalents), the plug deductions should instead be 26.2%, and in the case of any remaining E&P, the plug deduction should instead be 61.9%. After applying the plug deductions, the ultimate transition tax rate for individuals taxed at the highest 2018 ordinary rate of 37% should therefore be approximately 27.3% in the case of E&P comprising cash and cash equivalents (100% – 26.2% times 37%) and approximately 14.1% in the case of any remaining E&P (100% – 61.9% times 37%).

We are not aware of guidance from the IRS that specifically recognizes the increase in the transition tax rate, but the above analysis is what seems to follow from the current language of the Section 965 statute and the accompanying proposed regulations.

FURTHER GUIDANCE FROM THE IRS

For further guidance, the IRS has a FAQ page dedicated to explaining the nuances of the transition tax and its reporting rules.

The page can be found here: https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/questions-and-answers-about-reporting-related-to-section-965-on-2017-tax-returns

Due to the complexity of Trump’s reform legislation, we expect that we’ll be writing a number of additional blogs that analyze the tax reform. For the latest news and in-depth coverage of the tax reform provisions, including further analysis of accompanying regulations and IRS publications, stay tuned throughout the year!

More from our experts:

CASE REVIEW – COURT CONSIDERS IF TREATY NONRESIDENT HAS FBAR REQUIREMENT

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California tackled the issue of whether a taxpayer is required to file an FBAR if he has the status of a non-US tax resident by virtue of the tie-breaker provisions of a tax treaty.

CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING – A TRAP FOR THE UNWARY EXPAT

In this week’s blog, we focus on corporate restructurings, which are ripe for misunderstanding and complacency, given that the foreign company rules in the US and in your country of residence can be significantly at odds.

OUR APPROACH TO AN EFFECTIVE RENUNCIATION

In this blog, we review the tax and reporting implications of renouncing one’s citizenship and abandoning one’s green card. We then describe how our firm can help you navigate the process. We include a case study involving real facts, so that you can fully understand our approach and the services we offer.

CASE REVIEW – COURT CONSIDERS IF FOREIGN TAX CREDITS CAN REDUCE THE NIIT

In this week’s blog, we review a recent intriguing decision, in which the U.S. Court of Federal Claims tackled the issue of whether a tax treaty can be used to allow a foreign tax credit to offset the net investment income tax.

Contact us to get started