BLOG

IRS TAX AMNESTY AFTER TRUMP REFORM

January 16, 2019

By Joshua Ashman, CPA & Nathan Mintz, Esq.

Share this article

IRS TAX AMNESTY AFTER TRUMP REFORM – SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION

Last Update: December 2021

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”), encated at the end of 2017, undoubtedly brought many significant changes to the U.S. tax system. Because the TCJA changed the Tax Code in so many areas, it’s important to understand how its provisions affect U.S. expats living abroad

In this blog, we tackle this issue from the perspective of the expat looking for a viable solution after failing to file past tax returns and/or FBARs. We separate fact from fiction with respect to the IRS’s sanctioned tax amnesty programs moving forward.

FACT OR FICTION – EXPATS ARE NO LONGER SUBJECT TO CITIZENSHIP-BASED TAXATION UNDER THE REFORM.

Fiction.

When President Trump initially laid out his tax reform plan during his campaign for the U.S. presidency, he very broadly suggested that he would push for a shift to a system of territorial or residence-based taxation.

As enacted, the TCJA does in fact change the scope of U.S. taxation, but only for U.S. corporations – shifting to what can be described as a quasi-territorial system. However, it does not affect the overall tax and reporting obligations of U.S. individuals living abroad.

We do note that at the end of 2018, an additional bill was brought to the House of Representatives (The Tax Fairness For Americans Abroad Act of 2018 (H.R. 7358)), which would essentially end citizenship-based taxation for individuals as well, but the bill was never passed.

So yes – FBAR and FATCA and the other foreign information reporting rules and concepts U.S. expats have become accustomed to continue to apply.

For delinquent U.S. citizens living abroad, the IRS amnesty programs remain an essential path to coming back into compliance with the IRS, which still requires you to file even though you may be living and working abroad.

FACT OR FICTION – TAX AMNESTY IS RARELY GRANTED.

Fiction.

In recent years, the IRS has made it clear to taxpayers that it is more interested in disclosure than in punishing late filers or non-filers.  In 2014, the IRS expanded its more lenient program, the Streamlined Procedures, allowing taxpayers to participate if they can explain in a written statement how their delinquency was not intentional.

This lenient approach has allowed many delinquent taxpayers to successfully enter its amnesty programs. Tens of thousands of taxpayers successfully use the program each year to get caught up with the IRS.

FACT OR FICTION – I NEED TO DISCLOSE MY ENTIRE TAX HISTORY.

Fiction.

One of the strongest benefits of entering a tax amnesty program is the ability to become completely compliant without having to disclose your entire past.  The IRS recognized that gathering financial information about the distant past can be cumbersome, if not impossible, so in order to encourage disclosure, it limited the tax years that require filing.

Under the Streamlined Procedures, taxpayers are required to file only the prior 3 years of tax returns, including required information returns, and 6 years of FBARs.

FACT OR FICTION – I’LL SUFFER SEVERE PENALTIES.

Fiction.

A taxpayer who qualifies for the foreign offshore Streamlined Procedures can come clean with the IRS and potentially suffer no penalties. In order to qualify, a taxpayer must fulfill a non-residency requirement and certify that that the failure to report all income, pay all tax, and submit all required information returns, including FBARs, resulted from non-willful conduct.

Unpaid taxes and interest must be paid, if due, but in many cases, taxpayers can utilize the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion and/or foreign tax credits to reduce or eliminate taxes due.

FACT OR FICTION – THE STREAMLINED PROCEDURES IS NOT THE ONLY TAX AMNESTY PROGRAM AVAILABLE.

Fact.

While the Streamlined Procedures is the main program for non-willfully delinquent taxpayers, there are a number of additional options available to delinquent taxpayers.  For example, there are special procedures for taxpayers who have only failed to file FBARs.

There is also a program for willfully delinquent taxpayers, featuring heavier penalties (but avoidance of criminal prosecution), which was introduced shortly after the OVDP program ended in 2018.

For this reason, if you are a delinquent taxpayer looking to catch up with the IRS, it is critical that you weigh all of the options available to you.

FACT OR FICTION – THE IRS TAX AMNESTY PROGRAMS MAY NOT LAST FOREVER.

Fact.

The IRS has given no certainty that it will maintain its tax amnesty programs on a permanent basis. In fact, with respect to the Streamlined Procedures, IRS officials have repeatedly expressed that the program will end when it feels that that there’s no way a taxpayer who would want to participate couldn’t have heard about the process (rendering the taxpayer willfully delinquent by default).

For this reason, if you are a delinquent taxpayer living abroad, it is critical that you consider coming clean sooner rather than later. A number of options are currently available to you, including and in addition to the IRS amnesty programs.  Each option has its advantages and disadvantages, and choosing the best way forward requires a careful analysis of your particular facts and circumstances. Our experts at Expat Tax Professionals are available to help discuss your options and guide you through each step of the disclosure process.

More from our experts:

TAXPAYER ADVOCATE CRITICAL OF AUTOMATIC PENALTIES

In this week's blog, we review the Taxpayer Advocate's latest statements criticizing the IRS's automatic penalty system.

Circuit Court Reverses Taxpayer-Friendly Decision on Form 5471 Penalties

In this week’s blog, we review the D.C. Circuits Court’s reversal of the Farhy decision, a surprising case from last year holding that the IRS lacks the statutory authority to assess certain international return penalties.

US EXPAT TAXATION OF ALIMONY PAYMENTS

In this week’s blog, we review the U.S. tax rules relating to the payment of alimony, both from a domestic law and a treaty law perspective.

CASE REVIEW – COURT CONSIDERS IF TREATY NONRESIDENT HAS FBAR REQUIREMENT

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California tackled the issue of whether a taxpayer is required to file an FBAR if he has the status of a non-US tax resident by virtue of the tie-breaker provisions of a tax treaty.

Contact us to get started