BLOG

THE ROLE OF RESIDENCY IN THE STREAMLINED PROCEDURES

August 16, 2015

By Ephraim Moss, Esq. & Joshua Ashman, CPA

Share this article

STREAMLINED PROCEDURES – THE ROLE OF RESIDENCY

As a U.S. expat, you may have heard about the latest and greatest IRS amnesty program available for delinquent U.S. taxpayers known as the “streamlined procedures.”  What you may not know is that if you continue to spend a significant time in the U.S. each year, your eligibility for the procedures and your ability to obtain penalty-free relief may be in jeopardy.

The key issue here is “residency,” which separates the friendlier “foreign offshore” procedures (available for taxpayers residing outside the U.S.) from the harsher “domestic offshore” procedures (available for taxpayers residing in the U.S.)

For instance, a domestic resident taxpayer that has failed to file a U.S. income tax return in any of the three most recent tax years cannot participate in the domestic offshore procedures, while a foreign resident taxpayer that has been similarly delinquent can participate in the foreign offshore procedures.  Further, even if you qualify, the domestic offshore procedures require you to pay a 5% penalty on the highest aggregate balance/value of your foreign financial assets, while the foreign offshore procedures have no such penalty.

Because residency plays such an important role in how the streamlined procedures function, the IRS has provided some guidance explaining the residency concept. According to the IRS, a U.S. expat qualifies as a non-resident if – in at least one year during the three-year period that tax returns must be submitted under the streamlined procedures – he or she both:

(1) did not have a U.S. “abode” (generally, one’s home, habitation, residence, domicile, or place of dwelling); and

(2) was physically outside the United States for at least 330 full days (meaning, the taxpayer did not spend more than 35 days in the United States).

Keeping these rules in mind, we can analyze the following typical fact pattern of a so-called Canadian “snowbird”:

Each year for the past many years, Mr. Xavier Patrick, a dual U.S. and Canadian citizen, has been physically present and gainfully employed in Canada for 10.5 months out of the year. During the remaining 1.5 months, Mr. Patrick has vacationed in the U.S. with his family. Mr. Patrick, thinking he has no connection to the U.S. other than his temporary physical presence, has filed returns in Canada, but has not filed U.S. tax returns for the past three years.

According to the IRS’s residency rules, Mr. Patrick would not qualify for the streamlined procedures because he has failed the 330-day physical presence test (and therefore would be required to qualify under the domestic offshore procedures) and he has not filed U.S. tax returns in any of the three previous tax years (and therefore does not qualify under the domestic offshore procedures).  Further, even if Mr. Patrick had been filing U.S. returns and qualified for the domestic offshore procedures, he still may be subject to the 5% penalty tax.

If you are an expat considering the streamlined procedures, then it is critically important that you understand the requirements and relief available under your specific circumstances.  Our expat professionals have helped many clients understand and participate in the streamlined procedures, both under the foreign and domestic offshore programs.  We are available to help discuss your options and guide you through each step of the IRS streamlined program.

More from our experts:

OUR APPROACH TO AN EFFECTIVE RENUNCIATION

In this blog, we review the tax and reporting implications of renouncing one’s citizenship and abandoning one’s green card. We then describe how our firm can help you navigate the process. We include a case study involving real facts, so that you can fully understand our approach and the services we offer.

CASE REVIEW – COURT CONSIDERS IF FOREIGN TAX CREDITS CAN REDUCE THE NIIT

In this week’s blog, we review a recent intriguing decision, in which the U.S. Court of Federal Claims tackled the issue of whether a tax treaty can be used to allow a foreign tax credit to offset the net investment income tax.

CASE REVIEW – WHEN FBAR INSTRUCTIONS GET LOST IN TRANSLATION

In this week’s blog, we review a case deciding whether a mistranslated version of the FBAR instructions was a good enough excuse for a U.S. expat to avoid willful FBAR penalties.

ESTATE TAX IMPLICATIONS FOR NONRESIDENT ALIENS

In this blog, we describe the implications of holding U.S. assets upon death, which may depend on a number of factors, including the country in which you reside.

Contact us to get started